Difference between revisions of "Libertarian Manifesto"
(added the landing page for the manifesto) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Short description|Foundational libertarian manifesto and policy framework of the New Swatantra Party}} | ||
| + | {{DISPLAYTITLE:Libertarian Manifesto}} | ||
| − | + | The '''Libertarian Manifesto of the New Swatantra Party''' sets out a framework for governance grounded in individual liberty, equality before law, property rights, voluntary exchange, and strict limits on state power. It argues that India’s persistent failures arise primarily from institutional design—discretionary governance, opaque rules, and weak accountability—rather than cultural or moral deficits. | |
| − | The '''Libertarian Manifesto of the New Swatantra Party''' sets out a | ||
| − | The manifesto | + | The manifesto functions as the party’s '''foundational doctrine'''. All policy papers, technical whitepapers, electoral programmes, and transition frameworks are derived from and constrained by the principles set out here. |
| − | + | ||
| + | It emphasises rule-based governance (law over discretion), accountability through liability (remedy over permission), and decentralised decision-making (choice over compulsion). | ||
| + | |||
| + | __TOC__ | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
The manifesto rests on a simple institutional claim: | The manifesto rests on a simple institutional claim: | ||
| − | ''' | + | '''A free society requires predictable rules, limited government, and enforceable accountability.''' |
Rather than expanding state control or pursuing identity-based redistribution, the New Swatantra Party advocates reforms that bind the state to clearly defined functions—law, justice, security, and protection of property—while leaving economic and social life to individuals, markets, families, and voluntary associations. | Rather than expanding state control or pursuing identity-based redistribution, the New Swatantra Party advocates reforms that bind the state to clearly defined functions—law, justice, security, and protection of property—while leaving economic and social life to individuals, markets, families, and voluntary associations. | ||
| − | The document | + | The document is not an electoral programme. It does not specify budgets, timelines, or schemes. Its purpose is to define limits, principles, and direction against which all future policy proposals must be judged. |
| − | |||
== Core Principles == | == Core Principles == | ||
=== Individual Liberty === | === Individual Liberty === | ||
| − | Individuals are sovereign over their own lives, bodies, labour, and property. | + | Individuals are sovereign over their own lives, bodies, labour, and property. Political authority exists only to protect this autonomy—not to supervise, moralise, or direct personal choices. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | Freedom is defined not as the absence of rules, but as the presence of general, predictable, and equally applied law. Peaceful actions may not be restricted merely because they are unpopular, unconventional, or disapproved of by those in power. | |
| − | |||
=== Equality Before Law === | === Equality Before Law === | ||
All citizens are equal before the law. The state must not classify individuals by caste, religion, language, occupation, or identity for the purpose of granting privileges or imposing burdens. | All citizens are equal before the law. The state must not classify individuals by caste, religion, language, occupation, or identity for the purpose of granting privileges or imposing burdens. | ||
| − | Where historical injustices require remedy, such measures must be | + | Where historical injustices require remedy, such measures must be limited, transitional, and aimed at restoring equal treatment—not entrenching permanent legal distinctions. |
| − | |||
=== Limited Role of the State === | === Limited Role of the State === | ||
The legitimate functions of the state are restricted to: | The legitimate functions of the state are restricted to: | ||
| − | |||
* Protection of life, liberty, and property | * Protection of life, liberty, and property | ||
* Enforcement of contracts and liability | * Enforcement of contracts and liability | ||
| Line 41: | Line 39: | ||
The state must not prescribe morality, manage culture, operate commercial enterprises, or direct economic outcomes. Expansion beyond these functions results in arbitrariness rather than care. | The state must not prescribe morality, manage culture, operate commercial enterprises, or direct economic outcomes. Expansion beyond these functions results in arbitrariness rather than care. | ||
| − | |||
=== Property Rights and Markets === | === Property Rights and Markets === | ||
| − | Secure property rights are | + | Secure property rights are treated as the foundation of freedom, economic independence, and dignity. Markets are viewed not as ideology but as systems of voluntary cooperation that decentralise decision-making and discipline power through competition. |
| − | Where harm occurs, | + | Where harm occurs, it must be addressed through law and liability rather than regulation, bans, or discretionary control. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
=== Welfare as Transitional Support === | === Welfare as Transitional Support === | ||
| − | The manifesto rejects both abandonment and paternalism. It | + | The manifesto rejects both abandonment and paternalism. It recognises that decades of regulation and state control have created dependency that cannot be undone instantly. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | Accordingly, welfare is framed as transitional restitution rather than permanent entitlement. Support must be rule-based, identity-blind, time-limited, and explicitly oriented toward exit as institutional barriers are dismantled and opportunity expands. | |
| − | |||
=== Decentralisation and Federalism === | === Decentralisation and Federalism === | ||
Power should be exercised at the lowest level consistent with accountability. Local governments must function as genuine decision-making bodies rather than administrative extensions of higher authorities. | Power should be exercised at the lowest level consistent with accountability. Local governments must function as genuine decision-making bodies rather than administrative extensions of higher authorities. | ||
| − | The manifesto supports competitive federalism, state autonomy, and strong local governance as safeguards against | + | The manifesto supports competitive federalism, state autonomy, and strong local governance as safeguards against centralised error. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== Economic Framework == | == Economic Framework == | ||
| Line 78: | Line 59: | ||
Key elements include: | Key elements include: | ||
| − | |||
* Abolition of direct taxes on income, capital, and savings | * Abolition of direct taxes on income, capital, and savings | ||
| − | * A flat, uniform consumption tax | + | * A flat, uniform consumption tax with constitutional rate caps |
* Elimination of customs duties and transaction taxes | * Elimination of customs duties and transaction taxes | ||
| − | * | + | * Exit of the state from commercial enterprise |
* Market-based pricing of energy, transport, and utilities | * Market-based pricing of energy, transport, and utilities | ||
| − | + | For detailed design and implementation, see: | |
| − | + | * [[Tax Reform]] | |
| + | * [[GST 2.0 Policy Paper]] | ||
| + | * [[Fiscal Responsibility]] | ||
| + | * [[Trade Policy]] | ||
| + | * [[Privatisation]] | ||
| + | * [[Industrial Policy]] | ||
== Justice, Security, and Accountability == | == Justice, Security, and Accountability == | ||
| − | The manifesto treats rule of law as the state’s most critical obligation. It proposes: | + | The manifesto treats the rule of law as the state’s most critical obligation. It proposes: |
| − | |||
* Time-bound judicial processes | * Time-bound judicial processes | ||
* Expansion of court capacity | * Expansion of court capacity | ||
| Line 97: | Line 81: | ||
* Strict limits on sovereign immunity | * Strict limits on sovereign immunity | ||
| − | National security policy is grounded in armed neutrality, defensive strength, and | + | National security policy is grounded in armed neutrality, defensive strength, and deterrence rather than interventionism. |
| − | + | Related documents: | |
| − | + | * [[Judicial Reform]] | |
| + | * [[Police Reform]] | ||
| + | * [[National Security and Defence]] | ||
== Civil and Personal Liberties == | == Civil and Personal Liberties == | ||
The manifesto supports robust protections for free speech, privacy, freedom of belief, and personal choice. It opposes censorship, moral policing, and regulatory control over culture, expression, and peaceful consumption. | The manifesto supports robust protections for free speech, privacy, freedom of belief, and personal choice. It opposes censorship, moral policing, and regulatory control over culture, expression, and peaceful consumption. | ||
| − | + | Related documents: | |
| − | + | * [[Civil Liberties]] | |
| + | * [[Alcohol and Intoxicants]] | ||
| + | * [[Cultural Sovereignty]] | ||
== Structure of the Manifesto == | == Structure of the Manifesto == | ||
| − | The | + | The manifesto is organised as a layered framework: |
* '''Foundational Doctrine''' – defining principles and limits | * '''Foundational Doctrine''' – defining principles and limits | ||
| Line 116: | Line 104: | ||
* '''Transition Frameworks''' – sequencing reforms to avoid disruption | * '''Transition Frameworks''' – sequencing reforms to avoid disruption | ||
| − | This structure is intended to prevent ad-hoc policymaking and ensure consistency across governance domains. | + | This structure is intended to prevent ad-hoc policymaking and ensure internal consistency across governance domains. |
| − | |||
== What the Manifesto Rejects == | == What the Manifesto Rejects == | ||
The New Swatantra Party explicitly rejects: | The New Swatantra Party explicitly rejects: | ||
| − | |||
* Authoritarian nationalism | * Authoritarian nationalism | ||
* State-enforced cultural or religious norms | * State-enforced cultural or religious norms | ||
| Line 131: | Line 117: | ||
Arbitrary power, even when exercised in the name of the people, is not considered legitimate. | Arbitrary power, even when exercised in the name of the people, is not considered legitimate. | ||
| − | |||
== Purpose == | == Purpose == | ||
| − | The Libertarian Manifesto does not promise perfect governance. | + | The Libertarian Manifesto does not promise perfect governance. It promises limits—on power, discretion, and arbitrariness. |
| + | |||
| + | Its objective is a constitutional republic where citizens know their rights are protected rather than negotiated, economic success depends on effort rather than connections, and government serves under law rather than ruling by discretion. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For sequencing and safeguards, see [[The New Swatantra Roadmap]]. | ||
Latest revision as of 19:39, 3 February 2026
The Libertarian Manifesto of the New Swatantra Party sets out a framework for governance grounded in individual liberty, equality before law, property rights, voluntary exchange, and strict limits on state power. It argues that India’s persistent failures arise primarily from institutional design—discretionary governance, opaque rules, and weak accountability—rather than cultural or moral deficits.
The manifesto functions as the party’s foundational doctrine. All policy papers, technical whitepapers, electoral programmes, and transition frameworks are derived from and constrained by the principles set out here.
It emphasises rule-based governance (law over discretion), accountability through liability (remedy over permission), and decentralised decision-making (choice over compulsion).
Overview
The manifesto rests on a simple institutional claim:
A free society requires predictable rules, limited government, and enforceable accountability.
Rather than expanding state control or pursuing identity-based redistribution, the New Swatantra Party advocates reforms that bind the state to clearly defined functions—law, justice, security, and protection of property—while leaving economic and social life to individuals, markets, families, and voluntary associations.
The document is not an electoral programme. It does not specify budgets, timelines, or schemes. Its purpose is to define limits, principles, and direction against which all future policy proposals must be judged.
Core Principles
Individual Liberty
Individuals are sovereign over their own lives, bodies, labour, and property. Political authority exists only to protect this autonomy—not to supervise, moralise, or direct personal choices.
Freedom is defined not as the absence of rules, but as the presence of general, predictable, and equally applied law. Peaceful actions may not be restricted merely because they are unpopular, unconventional, or disapproved of by those in power.
Equality Before Law
All citizens are equal before the law. The state must not classify individuals by caste, religion, language, occupation, or identity for the purpose of granting privileges or imposing burdens.
Where historical injustices require remedy, such measures must be limited, transitional, and aimed at restoring equal treatment—not entrenching permanent legal distinctions.
Limited Role of the State
The legitimate functions of the state are restricted to:
- Protection of life, liberty, and property
- Enforcement of contracts and liability
- Administration of impartial justice
- Maintenance of internal and external security
The state must not prescribe morality, manage culture, operate commercial enterprises, or direct economic outcomes. Expansion beyond these functions results in arbitrariness rather than care.
Property Rights and Markets
Secure property rights are treated as the foundation of freedom, economic independence, and dignity. Markets are viewed not as ideology but as systems of voluntary cooperation that decentralise decision-making and discipline power through competition.
Where harm occurs, it must be addressed through law and liability rather than regulation, bans, or discretionary control.
Welfare as Transitional Support
The manifesto rejects both abandonment and paternalism. It recognises that decades of regulation and state control have created dependency that cannot be undone instantly.
Accordingly, welfare is framed as transitional restitution rather than permanent entitlement. Support must be rule-based, identity-blind, time-limited, and explicitly oriented toward exit as institutional barriers are dismantled and opportunity expands.
Decentralisation and Federalism
Power should be exercised at the lowest level consistent with accountability. Local governments must function as genuine decision-making bodies rather than administrative extensions of higher authorities.
The manifesto supports competitive federalism, state autonomy, and strong local governance as safeguards against centralised error.
Economic Framework
The libertarian manifesto proposes a restructuring of India’s economic governance based on low, broad-based taxation, deregulation, free trade, and fiscal discipline.
Key elements include:
- Abolition of direct taxes on income, capital, and savings
- A flat, uniform consumption tax with constitutional rate caps
- Elimination of customs duties and transaction taxes
- Exit of the state from commercial enterprise
- Market-based pricing of energy, transport, and utilities
For detailed design and implementation, see:
Justice, Security, and Accountability
The manifesto treats the rule of law as the state’s most critical obligation. It proposes:
- Time-bound judicial processes
- Expansion of court capacity
- Independent prosecution
- Local control and accountability in policing
- Strict limits on sovereign immunity
National security policy is grounded in armed neutrality, defensive strength, and deterrence rather than interventionism.
Related documents:
Civil and Personal Liberties
The manifesto supports robust protections for free speech, privacy, freedom of belief, and personal choice. It opposes censorship, moral policing, and regulatory control over culture, expression, and peaceful consumption.
Related documents:
Structure of the Manifesto
The manifesto is organised as a layered framework:
- Foundational Doctrine – defining principles and limits
- Policy Papers – outlining institutional reforms by domain
- Technical Whitepapers – detailing implementation where complexity requires
- Transition Frameworks – sequencing reforms to avoid disruption
This structure is intended to prevent ad-hoc policymaking and ensure internal consistency across governance domains.
What the Manifesto Rejects
The New Swatantra Party explicitly rejects:
- Authoritarian nationalism
- State-enforced cultural or religious norms
- Crony capitalism and discretionary subsidies
- Populist redistribution
- Identity-based politics
- Moral policing
- Retrospective and arbitrary governance
Arbitrary power, even when exercised in the name of the people, is not considered legitimate.
Purpose
The Libertarian Manifesto does not promise perfect governance. It promises limits—on power, discretion, and arbitrariness.
Its objective is a constitutional republic where citizens know their rights are protected rather than negotiated, economic success depends on effort rather than connections, and government serves under law rather than ruling by discretion.
For sequencing and safeguards, see The New Swatantra Roadmap.
